www.delverec.com
Categories
Candidates Clients

Technical vs. Leadership career paths

Technical vs. Leadership Career Paths: Which One is Right for You?

By Gareth Foden

Choosing between a technical or leadership career path is a pivotal decision for engineers, influencing both professional satisfaction and career progression. This choice often comes down to a preference for deepening technical expertise or embracing management responsibilities. Let’s explore both paths, incorporating concepts like the bell curve and Y-shaped career graphs to provide a balanced perspective.

The technical track

Engineers on the technical track focus on refining their specialised skills, becoming subject matter experts in areas such as software development, mechanical design, or chemical processes. This path allows for immersion in complex problem-solving and innovation without the added responsibilities of managing people. As engineers progress, they may attain titles like Senior Engineer, Principal Engineer, or Technical Fellow. Many organisations recognise and reward high-level technical expertise with roles that carry influence without requiring a transition into management.

The leadership track

Alternatively, the leadership track involves transitioning into roles that require managing teams, projects, and strategic initiatives. Engineering Managers and Technology Leaders not only oversee technical projects but also mentor staff, allocate resources, and align engineering goals with business objectives. This path is well-suited to those who enjoy guiding others and shaping the direction of an organisation. However, leadership roles still require a strong technical foundation to make informed decisions and earn the respect of technical teams.

The bell curve in career progression

The bell curve, or normal distribution, is often referenced in performance evaluations and career growth. It suggests that a majority of professionals perform at an average level, with fewer individuals achieving exceptionally high or low performance. However, this model has faced criticism for potentially fostering competition over collaboration and failing to account for individual growth trajectories. Some argue that career progression is more fluid and does not always follow a strict normal distribution.

The y-shaped career path

The Y-shaped career path illustrates the decision point where engineers choose between continuing in a technical role or moving into management. This model emphasises that both paths are valuable, and the choice should align with personal interests, strengths, and career aspirations. It is also possible to transition between tracks, although this may require additional training or adjustments. Many organisations offer parallel career progression opportunities, allowing engineers to advance without necessarily moving into leadership roles.

Making the decision

When considering which path to pursue, reflect on the following:

  • Self-Assessment: Do you gain more satisfaction from solving technical challenges, or do you enjoy leading and mentoring others
  • Career Aspirations: Where do you see yourself in the future? Technical roles can lead to positions such as Chief Engineer, while leadership paths may progress to executive roles.
  • Skill Development: Technical paths require continuous learning in specialised areas, whereas leadership roles demand skills in management, communication, and strategy.
  • Organisational Structure: Some companies provide dual career ladders that value both technical expertise and leadership, allowing for advancement in either track.

Ultimately, there is no right or wrong answer—just the path that best suits your strengths and ambitions. Both technical expertise and leadership skills are crucial to the success of engineering teams, and companies increasingly recognise the need for excellence in both domains. Whichever route you choose, staying adaptable and continuously learning will help you succeed.

Ready to take the next step in your career? Whether you’re drawn to deep technical expertise or inspired by leadership opportunities, making a conscious choice about your path is key to long-term success. Assess your strengths, explore your options, and take proactive steps toward the career that aligns with your ambitions. Stay curious, keep learning, and shape your future with confidence.

Reach out to our team to see how they can support you on your journey.

Email: [email protected]

Call: +44 1606 212020

Categories
Candidates Clients

The hidden engine of Germany’s innovation: Why the future of engineering relies on a proactive approach

Engineers

Germany’s Engineering Talent Shortage: Why a Proactive Hiring Approach is Essential

Germany is known for its engineering excellence, from automotive innovation to advanced industrial automation. But the industry faces a growing challenge: a shortage of skilled engineers.

For many engineering businesses, the question is no longer if they will struggle to hire but when. Nearly 60% of German SMEs in the engineering sector cite staff shortages as their biggest barrier to growth. The issue isn’t that the engineering talent pool is disappearing—it’s shifting.

To stay ahead, German engineering firms must rethink their hiring strategies and adopt a proactive approach to talent acquisition.

The Changing Landscape of Engineering in Germany

The engineering sector in Germany is undergoing a major shift due to Industry 4.0, digitalisation, and sustainability initiatives. These changes are driving demand for new skill sets, including:

  • Mechatronics engineers – Integrating mechanical and electronic systems.
  • Software engineers – Implementing AI, IoT, and automation in manufacturing.
  • Sustainability specialists – Developing energy-efficient and eco-friendly solutions.

These evolving roles create exciting opportunities, but the challenge is clear: the demand for these skills far exceeds the supply.

And here’s the real problem—most of these engineers aren’t actively looking for new jobs.

Why Traditional Hiring No Longer Works

For years, German engineering firms relied on a reactive hiring model:

  1. Post a job.
  2. Wait for applications.
  3. Choose the best candidate.

That approach worked when there was a steady pipeline of engineers. But today, that pipeline is shrinking.

  • Germany will face a shortfall of 140,000 engineers by 2027.
  • Only 24% of technical professionals are actively searching for jobs.

The best engineering talent isn’t applying for roles—they’re being headhunted. If your company is waiting for applicants, you’re already behind.

Proactive Talent Engagement: A Smarter Recruitment Strategy

The solution? Proactive talent engagement—building relationships with skilled professionals before they enter the job market.

Here’s what that looks like:

  • Employer Branding: Increase visibility in engineering networks and industry events.
  • Data-Driven Hiring: Use advanced sourcing tools to identify top candidates.
  • Targeted Outreach: Engage passive candidates with personalised offers.

For example, instead of waiting for a robotics engineer to apply, a firm could use LinkedIn and industry-specific platforms to identify top talent and proactively approach them with an offer tailored to their career goals.

How Leading Engineering Firms Are Adapting

Germany’s top engineering firms are already using proactive hiring strategies to secure the best talent:

  • Bosch – Invests in employer branding and direct sourcing to attract AI and IoT experts.
  • Siemens – Uses social media and employee advocacy to connect with passive candidates.

Smaller firms can compete by:

  • Partnering with universities to build early talent pipelines.
  • Leveraging modern hiring tools to find and engage engineers.
  • Encouraging employees to act as brand ambassadors on LinkedIn.

Beyond Hiring: Retaining Top Engineering Talent

Recruitment is only half the battle. Retention is just as important. Skilled engineers expect:

🏆 Continuous learning – Upskilling in AI, automation, and sustainability.

Work-life balance – Flexible hours and remote work options.

💡 A culture of innovation – Opportunities to lead projects and contribute ideas.

Companies that invest in people, not just machines, will secure the best engineering talent in Germany.

Final Thoughts: The Future of Engineering Recruitment

Germany’s engineering success has always been built on precision and innovation—but even the most advanced technology needs skilled professionals to drive it forward.

The companies that win the talent war won’t be those who wait for candidates to apply. They’ll be the ones actively searching for, engaging, and retaining the best engineers.

Ready to take a proactive approach to engineering hiring?

Contact Rob Bemment today:

LinkedIn: Rob Bemment

Email: [email protected]

Phone: +44 (0)1606 664 196